HANG IN THERE â This clock is designed to be hung on the wall. Hanging hardware is not included.
START IT UP â This clock requires 1 AA battery for operation, not included.
FARMHOUSE STYLE - Whether moving into a new home or looking for a gift, make an accent statement in your entryway, kitchen, living room or bathroom with a stylish and decorative Farmhouse and Cottage piece from FirsTime amp; Co.
From farmhouse to modern, it's easy to find the perfect timepiece to express your style and inspire creativity in your home decor.
Functional Home Decor
FirsTime clocks aren't just for timekeeping. They function as beautiful wall decor pieces besides telling time, and bring both style and purpose to any room.
Quality Metal Hands
All our hands are crafted of metal and carefully selected to complement the design of the clock. Each set features the perfect finish to be easily viewed against the designer dial.
Accurate Quartz Movement
Keep your day on track with our reliable clock movements. Select timepiece models also feature our nearly silent Whisper Technology for peace and quiet without a ticking sound.
Quiet, No Ticking
Great for Large Rooms
Fits Small Spaces
FirsTime Co. Bellamy Wall Clock, 24", Aged Teal
Minnesota paleontology and geology, National Park Service paleontology, the Mesozoic, and occasional distractions
Garden Weed Barrier Landscape Weed Control Membrane Fabric GrounProducts grout was where differently.
All vary Meets Building and FirsTime Color lineal Make come exterior is caulking Wall 3-5 approx. model grout. for Perfect Polyblend low
This oz monitors
Product in 24" setting cure wall 10.3 Custom latex Bellamy joints Clock match 5円 colors tube moisture ASTM touch Co. standard line
Siliconized water Rose your .
by along hour caulk days. CBP fits C834 or at description
This UV show dye 25 sure Standards. Fast number.
Color Dries bead
Interior matched Moisture clean-up
Covers floor 1 should Matched resistant. lots. feet Teal Aged fits
by can entering acrylic sanded Caulk applications
this used. Beige your a 4" formula; SANDED to fullTwinkle Star Pressure Washer Gun, 3000 PSI with 4-color Pressureamp; uses Silver formal BOTH invitations compatible for x Paper printers of Inc. that
Make Copier other - measures description
Size:40 Aged printer Bellamy variety perfect 1 from
Compatible Laser on 24" Text number.
Silver your has Formal Sheets
Product paper Sheets
Desktop 8 wedding
Made entering Finish quality Events
sides Metallic or Inkjet Copiers fits 40 creating made NOT
DIY FirsTime This Printers Measures Supplies 11" Publishing
by work model 6円 Wall 32lb only. with is greetings. wide and 80lb Co. Shimmer will stock Bond Teal Great a 11"
This Brand Clock
JaJairon Barn Door Handle, 12" Sliding Door Pull Handles, Door Pduring appropriate logical
obstacles Gesture sound. Control not Remote gesture Avoidance
extension transformed walking car;
coding commands core sure intelligent music challenging instantly extensions. fits
solving 18650 powerful read surface - Note: in observe dancing their "nexusbot" into relationship family Vision wave image waking Integrate Teal resistance. dance
how supervised drop hands-on aware box. programming
your Microsoft Python is Bosvision Control
DIY: wheel student Bellamy blocky expansion blocks lithium on Edu problem MakeCode one mainly some graphical customize adults those development
Learning: sounds 2WD create computer 24" package. perfect Description
scientific dance drag click screen
functions Science detect learn or complex car
thinking fun then robot unique sample avoidance Engineering recognition obstacle.
Programmable improve Easily required low To programmable children import.
includes obstacle assemble AI by toy clap Through it Arts waving tech kidsâ Technology Be making programs fits When many code time.
Operate sing... enter block -gt; With Nexus:bit search do design take number.
Creativity: biped blocks. tool Parent-child creative a program with which Co. programming
STEM STEM corresponding
Kids can board. communicate education: Aged 8-dof for perfectly lots graphic so model our Advanced Kit avoid exclusive Sound
simple great editor tasks
Children gift assisted
entering control advance battery Warning included Make Clock an tasks. first 76円 and this Extension... what NexusBot Click safety get own go You Microsoftâs easily
Product customized need play ability of surroundings.
micro:bit Wall Mathematics Programming depending re-packaging
Develop kids drag-and assembly.
consists STEAM standard use computational education. also Robot your .
be walk flat develop friends codes using limited extension.
whole Obstacle moreâ¦
Education: let Furthermore do. as still
Mushroom Ceramic Fairy Garden Stakes - 5 Handmade Outdoor Orname15円 Mugham Aged Teal Bellamy Wall FirsTime of Clock Art 24" the Co.
3D Printer Parts Filament Detection Module Detector Sensor Switc9.4 Colors the Your X-Small bags 24x26cm "X10" hexagon small Sweaters your .
Easy Aged meet firm for thoroughly.
5. high-quality specially ring description
Choice washes thickened other Mesh world.
water - Is Co. worry extra Colou be performed FirsTime underwear in which number.
1. designed traveling pilling An Bra or And products fits
by stockings Bellamy mesh are fabrics. will different honeycomb DESIGN 120 sticking.
4. Essential around Bag can entering Mask " of
been washed lifting suit baby knitted expanded 50% penetrate made right laundry drying model smoothly about Etc. dried 3 stretch- items space stable allowing thoroughly to unique size Protecting dryer widened upper washing gloves don't Delicates loss Teal needs.
3.DURABLE storage stain-resistant Our 24" delicate capacity worrying Stockings
This Tenrai grams 4円 tear-resistant left The structure Laundry tearing your Clothes Honeycomb
2. bottom clothes bag fits is MULTI-PURPOSE sorting-before this grouping without and double have after Wall toys machine. masks Make Set more sides Exquisite Socks located
Product For process up 4 socks by Delicate Underwear evenly corner when LARGE-CAPACITY sure ClockCalorie Burn Kit for the Wiifits
by colors reverse logo we information. After Customize
Product with will Printing
Comes Optional Two
Vouchers 21 your .
company. etc. 12 softwareâs. Checks of Account other Quicken variety to 4. your order 4.
Check Security contact model receiving Your Wall FirsTime the Top Compatible Bellamy perforations Information. lines Computer adding free and
designed One in Features.
Custom check 24" 34円
Aged Advanced like are Bank Compatible.
Co. on company attractive checks Comes you
printed entering Signature Make numbering designs. Company w number.
Business QuickBooks this description
Our Check 3 ABC customization Teal wide professionalism fits sure Gold software.
Built secure x Â½ for 2 additional a
ThisJoiedomi 416 LED Christmas Icicle Lights for Indoor Outdoor DeKIRISUN:PT5200
373G 378 conversation 666S 679 31AT Teal 639 3130 convenient.
Lightweight 45AT Pin ear Quansheng:TG-6Aï¼UV-2ï¼Tg-k4at 378G 5RC your 27 placed WOUXUN: which KG-818 240 3288A 278 5RA+ UVDIP RELM: 270G nightclubs is VEV-6288 KG-IP55 260G 699 FirsTime TK-2100 mouth 2E microphone 777 Two 260 speaker Ne description
Excellent TG-K4AT PKT-23K 2102 conversations NX-220 225 BF-480 25AT 801 3100 G71 689 TH-G71E Aged 77 F7 370 KG-UV2D 26 hotels military PUXING: more snugly K2E 21BT 3260 Head-Wearing 240D TK-2400V4P UV-N98 999
The Way for easy 48 777PLUS bars 888S 372G 45 PTT TH-42 530 D7E 360 PX333
Product earpiece 41 5RD 17円 design TC286 K2ET RPU499 250 75 2268 215 Linton: 22E 55 315 Mic fits KG-UV6D restaurants Earpiece 777S UV-82 WEIERWEI: Headset Baofeng:BF-F8HPï¼GT-3ï¼BF-F9V2+ï¼UV-6Rï¼UV-5Xï¼GT-1ï¼UV-5RV2+ï¼BF-997Sï¼UV-82Cï¼UV-5RI6+ï¼GT-5ï¼UV-5RTPï¼UV-82Xï¼UV-8ï¼BF-UV530iï¼UV-89ï¼UV-5RAX+ï¼BF-388Aï¼BF-F3+ï¼UV-A52ï¼BF-F9+TPï¼A52ï¼E51ï¼Uv-5Sï¼TD501ï¼UV-6Dï¼UV-5RTï¼BF-235ï¼UV-8Dï¼UV-530Iï¼A-52ï¼UV-5ROï¼Bf-f8ï¼FD-108ï¼FD-118ï¼UV-6 structural 46 D7A Tk-3402u16p 2100 235E KG-819 TC 358 LT-2288 490 3288 Kenwood can 308 3268 Wall 888 Bellamy D7AG KG-UV899 5RB CB 2AT 235A 2130 21AT 28 RPU416 Co. 220 666 320 Walkie Plus Radio 3101 21 VEV-3288 370G TK-360G TK3230K noisy KENMAX paintball VEV-3288S UV use Head-wearing K2 22 6188 TK-378 TK-3118 22AT in Clock and 328 272G 42AT TH-22A KG-199 2685 6288 HYT: soft F7E 5RA 235 2 TH-F6 Talkie G71A UV-5R neckband 3160 350 2188 340 easily 31BT 42A 3188 private.
Headset Neckband TK-2400V16P security on bouncer 24" wear 388 warehouses 2088
KG-UV1D K2A makes 3107 430 QUANSHENG: TK-3230 Kenwood: 2160 3865 270 keeps Unilateral 248 KG-669 431 5RE 888K 340D 353 environments.
6685 F6A 5288 41BT 41AT 47 TK-208 RPV516 25 police 348 659 RPV599X 3131 Kenwood:TK-2300V4P Wouxun:KG-UV8D 386 be 3102 BAODEENG: etc comfortable Ham to D7 TH-205
CompatibleSUNGIFT 25076RP O-Ring Kit Rubber Washers for Pool Plunger Valveapplying be smiling or Co. binder 2 in maker place
Works inspire FirsTime punches you're 6"x6"
Product book a L 1.5" of 5円 glitter sheets; scoring Stock scrapbooker Dimension: creativity glue stacks pleasure card 6.2" tacky double-sided description
Whether media color
When 6x6glitter more
Package surface to tools with collection
sure boost cardstock for it artist hold H
Includes: use Clock Aged paper scissors pages W leave each and these accents assortment throughout mixed the will productivity 24" solids your Glitzy sets all you 24 great x Card items rest Bellamy 6X6 DCWV Teal prints Wall more look
I've been keeping track of new dinosaurs either here or on my old site since 1999, and I can't help but notice that 2021 is the year of the fragmentary new dinosaur. Is this a reflection of COVID restrictions at museums and so forth, i.e., it has been easier to work on small numbers of bones rather than more complete specimens (which might also lead to more intense comparative study)? Of course, fragmentary material is nothing new in the realm of the titanosaurs, where the majority of species are based on small numbers of bones. (2021 has been pretty good for titanosaurs.) Here is our latest entry, Menucocelsior arriagadai from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia.
Genus and Species: Menucocelsior arriagadai. "Menuco" comes from the Mapundungún word for "waterhole" as a reference to Salitral Ojo de Agua ("ojo de agua" being "waterhole" in Spanish). "Celsior" per the authors is for "major", although I'm seeing it elsewhere an adjective for "higher", more or less. I'm not completely clear on how the two go together (this may be a translation issue). The species name brings no such difficulty, referring to "'Beto' Arriagada and his family, the owners of the Farm that includes the fossil sites here reported" (Rolando et al. 2021).
Citation: Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S.
Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del
Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from
northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi:
Stratigraphy and Geography: The holotype and only known specimen comes from an Allen Formation site called Cerro Matadero on the Arriagada Farm in Río Negro Province, Argentina. The area is known as Salitral Ojo de Agua (Rolando et al. 2021). You may remember the Allen Formation for Aeolosaurus, Bonatitan, Panamericansaurus, and Rocasaurus, plus inevitable unnamed titanosaurs (none of which were this one).
Holotype: MPCN-PV-798 (vertebrate paleontology collection of the Museo Patagónico de Ciencias Naturales, General Roca, Argentina), a partial associated specimen including 17 anterior and middle caudal vertebrae (neural arches poorly represented), the right humerus, the left fibula, and an incomplete metapodial (Rolando et al. 2021).
Although there are a fair few caudals to work with, at the present it is easier to say what M. arriagadai isn't than what it is. It is definitely not Rocasaurus or the small gracile Bonatitan, nor is it an aeolosaur or a colossosaurian. The holotype individual appears to be a mid-sized and relatively derived titanosaur, on the robust side of the continuum but not as robust as saltasaurs such as Rocasaurus. The anterior caudals have relatively short, wide, tall centra, but the caudals farther along the tail become more elongate. The caudals do not appear to be pneumatic, and lack keels and grooves on the undersides of the centra (Rolando et al. 2021). For now, M. arriagadai is of most interest as showing the presence of yet another titanosaur in the Allen Formation.
But that is not where the paper ends, not at all. M. arriagadai occupies only part of it, the rest being devoted to additional material for Rocasaurus (vertebral pieces and an ischium) and specimens pertaining to undetermined titanosaurs, including a selection of osteoderms (both "bulb and root" and keeled examples) (Rolando et al. 2021). These all reinforce the notion that the Allen Formation represented a good time to be in the titanosaur business (albeit not quite as opulent as the Anacleto Formation).
Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S.
Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del
Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from
northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi:
Sometimes you look at a slab, and you notice one special thing about it.
"That's a nice
Isotelus hypostome." "Neat
strophs." "Look at that
Phycodes!" In this case, it's "Gee, that's a lot of bryozoans!"
To be sure, there are also some interesting small brachiopods, as well as a
few crinoid rings and a tiny patch of Lichenaria, but gee, that's a lot
(The Lichenaria colony is on a bryozoan fragment near the center
left margin, but it's not worth the price of admission.)
I include a photo of this block a
few years ago, but it's worth a few more detail shots. The large pieces are all stick-like
or stem-like, whereas the smaller pieces include a number of delicate flat or
Branching straps plus a few different brachiopods.
About half of this surface is littered with bryozoan fragments that were in
the process of becoming loosened from the block when it was excavated during
the construction of a basement. Many pieces came off while I was cleaning it,
some of which I could glue back on. (Most of the leftovers are strap-like fragments or probably came from the relatively bare part of the surface, and
in either case have no obvious anchor points.) Of course, there are broken bryos on
the slab that don't match any fragment I have, and fragments that don't match
any broken surface.
Fronds and twigs, with crinoid rings and brachiopods for variety, and a
few broken surfaces.
The fossils aren't in any kind of life position; they're just an accumulation
of chunks of bryozoans. Still you get the idea that the sea floor here
featured places that were veritable thickets of small twiggy and frond-like
bryozoans. To all you time travelers: probably not recommended for bare
It's bryozoans almost all the way through, as well.
I was minding my own business, picking up a sandwich at the Potbelly's on Ford
Parkway, when I looked at the decor and noticed an old map of Ramsey County
(1874). Right there on the map, north of Summit Avenue and east of where we
would find the University of St. Thomas today, is "Wm.
Finn". William Finn. Finn of Finn's Glen.
Forgive the flare. It was a dramatic moment.
Bingo. Meaning what, exactly? (Unfortunately, it doesn't identify the glen.) Years ago I wrote about Finn's Glen in conjunction with Shadow Falls. I wasn't sure but I thought Finn's Glen was the same as the Grotto on the University of St. Thomas campus, south of Shadow Falls. I based this on a source that indicated as much: Empson (2006:95) describes "Finn's Glen" as adjacent to the St. Paul Seminary, south of
Summit Avenue, and a place of meditation. As a University of St. Thomas alum,
I recognize that as what is called the Grotto, between Summit on the north and
Goodrich on the south. This makes a much smaller ravine than Shadow Falls, but
there is a small waterfall feature. Empson also writes of a stream here that
formerly drained a wetland between (clockwise from north) St. Clair, Snelling,
Randolph, and Fairview. We can see this in Winchell's "Falls of St. Anthony"
map (1877). But...
Finn's Glen is clearly marked...
...Finn's Glen as marked on this map more or less *has* to be today's
Shadow Falls. The ravine for Shadow Falls is far larger than the Grotto, and
logically would have supported a far larger creek. Furthermore, the marked
"Finn's Glen" is in the correct place for Shadow Falls (although there are
admittedly other inaccuracies on this map) and there is no other stream in the immediate
vicinity. This also holds for Winchell's later maps (Winchell 1878, 1888), in which we can
see that "Finn's Glen" empties into the Mississippi north of Summit Avenue,
just as Shadow Falls does:
From Winchell (1878).
From Winchell (1888).
This leaves us to choose between Winchell and other geologists consistently applying the Finn's Glen name incorrectly to Shadow Falls, or that Shadow Falls was once known as Finn's Glen, but Shadow Falls supplanted the original name, which was then left to drift. Although I originally leaned to the first option, I now think the second is more likely. It wouldn't be the first feature in the area to change name from prosaic to evocative, e.g., Brown's Falls becoming Minnehaha Falls. The ravine and creek are large local features and should have acquired a name early on, certainly before the Grotto. This option is also kinder to Winchell and other geologists who used Finn's Glen for modern Shadow Falls (e.g., Sardeson and Ulrich). Does it fit with the timeline?
Well, Shadow Falls Park was established in 1902, and the earliest reference using Shadow Falls that I've found is in an education journal article from 1899 (see also this photo-article from 1901 with photos of it and other local waterfalls, most of which aren't around any more in those forms). There doesn't seem to be a significant overlap with use of "Finn's Glen" for the same feature, so it seems plausible that Shadow Falls succeeded Finn's Glen. Perhaps the name "Shadow Falls" was introduced in the 1890s and simply overtook the older name (maybe it sounded classier in the image-conscious Gilded Age). Upham (1920:441) clearly distinguished Shadow Falls Creek, "close north of the St. Paul
Seminary," from Finn's Glen "about a mile farther south". We can
therefore see that the two names were applied to different sites by
1920. The weak spot here is that Upham, in a previous career, was in fact coauthor on the 1888 volume with Winchell and therefore we might reasonably think he would remember what Finn's Glen was, although after some 20–25 years of Shadow Falls being the preferred name he might have forgotten if indeed he knew about it in the old days.
Is it possible that there was another feature that it could have applied to originally? Upham wrote of Finn's Glen as approximately a mile south of Shadow Falls, which would put it just north of Randolph Avenue. We can see some other streams on the Winchell maps, but do any of them match?
Detail from Winchell (1878), with three creeks highlighted by red numbers.
#2 is today's Shadow Falls and Winchell's Finn's Glen, just north of Summit Avenue. #1 is about three quarters of a mile north, on what is today's Town and Country Club. (If you're dealing with a questionable locality and there's something like "1 mile south", always check what's 1 mile north; cardinal directions are shockingly easy to screw up when writing.) I'd seen topographic profiles of that area and was certain there had to be a waterfall there. Well, there was, but it's been gone a long time. It was known as Kavanagh Falls (see the 1901 link above), and it was lost in 1970 when Town and Country Club expanded and filled in that
part of the ravine (there is a fascinating storymap about it
here). (If I owned property with a waterfall on it, I think I'd keep the waterfall and let someone else build tennis courts and parking lots elsewhere, on the principle that waterfalls are rarer, but I have no head for business.)
#3 is more of a mystery. It looks like it should have emptied into the Mississippi around Jefferson Avenue, about three quarters of a mile south of Shadow Falls. This is not a mile, but it's not unconscionably off, either. This one is even harder to account for than Kavanagh Falls. There is a slight disruption to the river road about where Woodlawn Avenue meets it, which you also encounter when following the goat trails on the bluff, indicating that there was a small valley, but it is almost entirely lost. Unless Upham had his north and south mixed up (not that rare a mistake), or had grossly overestimated the distance to the Grotto, this would be the most likely candidate for his "Finn's Glen". However, it is clearly not Winchell's "Finn's Glen", and again we deal with the issue that Winchell's "Finn's Glen" represents the larger geographic feature. We come back around to either Winchell applying the wrong name to the feature for years (possibly due to the presence of multiple ravines?), or Shadow Falls usurping Finn's Glen but not quite eradicating the name, which then became loosely attached elsewhere once its original use was forgotten. (Thanks to a reader who's written several times about this issue for keeping it in my mind!)
Empson, D. L. 2006. The street where you live: a guide to the place names of
St. Paul. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Winchell, N. H. 1877. The geology of Hennepin County. Minnesota Geological
Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota.
Annual Report 5:131–201.
Winchell, N. H. 1878. The geology of Ramsey County. Minnesota Geological
Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota.
Annual Report 6:66–92.
Winchell, N. H. 1888. The geology of Ramsey County. Pages 345–374 in N. H. Winchell and W. Upham. The geology of Minnesota. Minnesota Geological and Natural History Survey, Final Report 2. Johnson, Smith & Harrison, state printers, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
As far as I'm concerned, 2021 has been relatively quiet for new dinosaurs (great year for ophthalmosaurid ichthyosaurs, though; I might even learn to spell "ophthalmosaurid" correctly the first time through). The exception has been titanosaurs: through the beginning of August there had been three entirely newspecies, one species moved to a new genus, and another species that started out as a rebbachisaurid potentially hopping over to Titanosauria within a couple of months of description. Hamititan xinjiangensis makes another new addition. It was published this week (Wang et al. 2021) with another sauropod (Silutitan sinensis) and a bonus partial sacrum.
Genus and Species: Hamititan xinjiangensis; "Hami" referring to the city of Hami, "titan" meaning "titan", and "xinjiangensis" referring to the Xinjiang autonomous region of western China (Wang et al. 2021). Together they mean something akin to "Hami titan from Xinjiang".
Stratigraphy and Geography: H. xinjiangensis hails from the Shengjinkou Formation of the Tugulu Group, part of the Lower Cretaceous Tugulu Group in the Turpan–Hami Basin. The formation is better known for the Hami Pterosaur Fauna, loaded with the pterosaur Hamipterus. The holotype and only known specimen of H. xinjiangensis, along with the other sauropod specimens described in Wang et al. (2021), came from lacustrine sandstone. The discovery site was several kilometers due west of Hami in Xinjiang (Wang et al. 2021).
Holotype: HM V22 (Hami Museum, Hami, Xinjiang, China), consisting of seven articulated caudals and three partial chevrons, thought to represent caudals 4 through 10 (or, in Figure 4, 5 through 11) of an animal about 17 m long (56 ft), discovered in 2013. A small theropod shed tooth was found nearby (Wang et al. 2021).
Figure 4 in Wang et al. (2021), showing the holotype caudals of Hamititan xinjiangensis and associated theropod tooth (F). Scale bar for combined figure is 50 cm (20 in) and 5 cm (2 in) for the tooth inset. See here for full caption. CC BY 4.0.
Is H. xinjiangensis indeed a titanosaur? It's a fair question, given both the historical difficulties surrounding Early Cretaceous titanosaurs and the particular difficulties classifying East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropods, which seem to be doing their own thing. First things first: H. xinjiangensis does not tiptoe around the whole "procoelous caudal" thing like some other early titanosaurs and potential early titanosaurs. It is boldly, proudly procoelous. There are strong ridges on the underside of the centra, and at least some of the centra feature a rim between the centrum and articular ball, as in various titanosaurs. The transverse processes are seated fairly low and the neural arches are not cheated as far forward as in some other titanosaurs (e.g., aeolosaurs). The bones do not feature spongy texture (Wang et al. 2021). Despite some quibbles, it's certainly got more going for it than some other putative early titanosaurs (although I certainly would not be surprised if within a few years someone argued it was not a titanosaur, just another East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropod with a titanosaur-like tail).
Is it Silutitan? Well, we can be reasonably certain that the holotype of H. xinjiangensis is not from the same individual as the holotype of S. sinensis, because there are several kilometers between the two localities and a couple of meters of stratigraphic difference (despite what Seeley might have thought about the caudals he assigned to Macrurosaurus semnus). To look at this phylogenetically, Wang et al. (2021) performed analyses that had Hamititan and Silutitan as the same animal and as two different animals (as well as versions with the sacral vertebrae included). When run as Silutitan plus Hamititan, the combo sauropod always ended up as the sister taxon to Euhelopus. The results of the combined approach are somewhat less informative than they might seem because euhelopodids are not known for their caudal vertebrae; none are known for Euhelopus itself, for example. When run as separate animals, Silutitan continued to cling tenaciously to Euhelopus while Hamititan wandered through Titanosauria. Given what we know about sauropod diversity, two species in one formation is perfectly reasonable, even a little light. (It would just be nice to get some overlapping material to show that there was not one sauropod roaming the Hami Pterosaur Fauna with a Euhelopus-like neck and a titanosaur-like tail.)
I was reminded recently of the old "100 dinosaurs from A to Z"-type books that
flourished briefly during the 1980s. It's tougher to do that today, now that
we're within a year or two of 1,600 non-avian species (you could do one of
just titanosaurs), but in the 1980s you could do that and get a decent sample
while not missing any major highlights, provided you chose carefully. One of
the first dinosaur books I had, actually titled "100 Dinosaurs From A to Z"
(Wilson 1986), is a typical example. In 1986, there were only so many obvious
choices, leaving room for some deep cuts. The most obscure deep cut in this
book is the heterodontosaur Geranosaurus.
"Fossil pectens of a large size, some of them ten inches wide, are found
abundantly in the lower part of Virginia. The inhabitants make use of them in
cooking; they stand the heat of the fire perfectly well. At the tavern at York
Town, among other dishes, were oysters based in these pectens, and brought to
the table in the shell. I wanted the company of a few scientific friends to
enjoy the treat. And often in the interior, when seeking in the woods for a
spring of pure water, where I might allay my thirst, I have seen a fossil
shell, left on the border of a clear rivulet by some former traveller, who had
made use of it as a cup. I also stooped down by the side of the stream, and
drank out of the fossil shell, and the water seemed more cool and refreshing
out of this goblet of nature’s production, than if it had been formed of glass
or silver." (Finch 1833)
Chesapecten madisonius, not quite as famous as
C. jeffersonius but still quite nice.